Looking for a whodunit? Don’t. The mystery of Jeff Glor’s exit from CBS doesn’t boil down to boardroom drama or anchor infighting. It’s corporate cost-cutting, pure and simple—cue the spreadsheets, not the scandal. Let’s break down what happened, what it means for CBS, and why Glor’s story is the latest in a growing pile-up of big media departures.
A Quick Look Back: Jeff Glor’s CBS Run
If you’ve tuned into CBS over the past decade, chances are Jeff Glor’s face popped up—no-nonsense delivery, firm jawline, suit always on point. He’s no newbie. Glor joined CBS News in 2007 and quickly moved up the ranks. He anchored the *CBS Evening News* from late 2017 until 2019, then slid into the co-host chair on *CBS Saturday Morning*.
There, he became something of a Saturday breakfast staple—think oatmeal, but with breaking news. Along the way? Emmy nominations, big interviews, live coverage, and plenty of fill-in stints.
A steady hand—until, seemingly out of nowhere, the ax swung.
Meanwhile at Paramount: Panic at the Parent Company
Jeff Glor didn’t just wake up and decide he needed more sleep on weekends. If anything, his exit fits a brutal pattern inside his parent company, Paramount Global.
This is the media giant behind CBS, Showtime, MTV, and a motley list of streaming and cable brands. But here’s the spoiler: Paramount Global, like much of the old guard in media, has been bleeding cash and lagging on the P&L.
Earlier this year, Paramount announced mass layoffs—about 2,000 jobs gone, per *The Hollywood Reporter* and other trade outlets. CBS News and its divisions? Squarely in the target zone.
Bottom line? It’s less about news anchors and more about the accountants.
The Layoff Tally: Who Got Hit and Why
Want numbers? Paramount’s job cuts amount to about 6% of its global workforce. That’s not just a rounding error; it’s deep enough to touch almost every division—including CBS News.
Jeff Glor isn’t the only familiar face out. Correspondents like Catherine Herridge, veteran producers, and a string of legacy staffers have been slashed from payroll. These aren’t newbies or underperformers—they’re proven operators facing a spreadsheet, not a pink slip based on merit.
Paramount’s reasoning isn’t hard to find. Media companies invested heavily in streaming, but subscriber growth slowed and ad dollars scattered to digital. Legacy TV still makes money—but not enough to keep business as usual.
If anything, media layoffs in 2024 feel less like pruning and more like chopping off branches to save the tree.
Why the Bloodletting? Turning Red Ink to Black
Let’s call it what it is: panic at the old-media disco. Streaming wars? Check. Cord-cutting? Double check. Paramount’s own financial filings admit the whole sector is under fire from shrinking cable bundles, spiky content costs, and digital disruptors (see also: Netflix eating everyone’s lunch).
Add a Hollywood strikes hangover, weak advertising demand (especially in linear TV and local), and you get the picture. Executives came hunting for “efficiencies”—a fancy way to say jobs. Reports say the latest round came with an explicit cost-cutting target.
If you’re reading this with a spreadsheet open, here’s the trade-off: every $100 million in cuts might buy back a few months of runway, but at the price of newsroom know-how and brand stability.
It might work—until the next quarter or the next ad slump. Big media math is ruthless.
CBS News, Silent as a Stone
Looking for a heartfelt memo or a thank-you montage for Jeff Glor? Keep scrolling. CBS News hasn’t said a word on Glor’s exit, not in a press release, not in an email blast to fans.
Same goes for Glor himself—if he’s leaving any clues, it’s not on social media. Instead, reporters at places like *The New York Times* and *Variety* broke the news first, citing “industry sources” who confirmed Glor’s job was one of many evaporating.
Inside media circles, that kind of silence means only one thing: involuntary. When there’s no mutual-love announcement, no “pursuing exciting new opportunities,” it’s not about greener pastures.
Glor walks out, paycheck gone, with no sign that performance factored in. The context here matters: CBS News declined to comment on individual departures, period. That usually means everyone—including the seasoned professionals—was equally expendable.
It’s Not Just CBS—This Is an Industry Script
Take a beat and look wider. Paramount’s move isn’t a solo act. Mass layoffs have been rolling through media since late 2022, from CNN and ESPN to Vice and BuzzFeed.
Old-school TV giants face a brutal dilemma: How do you keep both the ad money and subscription fees flowing while investing in streaming…and not losing decades of newsroom cred? So far, answers range from “slash staff” to “hope for a hit show.” Neither strategy covers all the bases.
According to Pew Research, U.S. newsroom employment dropped 26% from 2008 to 2021—a trend that isn’t slowing down. Now, the cuts are coming for household names.
Meanwhile, digital startups that were supposed to be the future—see BuzzFeed News—are themselves folding or freezing hiring. It’s a tough time to be anyone with “editor” or “anchor” on their LinkedIn.
If you want the big story, it’s this: legacy companies are struggling to outrun the streaming collapse, while digital-first firms can’t monetize at scale. Everyone’s caught in a squeeze.
What’s Next for CBS News? (And for Viewers)
For CBS, the Glor exit is one piece of a much bigger game. Massive layoffs ripple through morale and institutional memory. The newsroom takes a hit—ask any manager who’s had to tell talented people to pack up their desks.
Now, CBS must convince viewers—and advertisers—it can keep the quality high with a slimmer team. For fans of *CBS Saturday Morning*, this means yet another on-air shuffle. For the remaining staff, it’s a nervous “who’s next?” mindset.
Company PR will announce “commitment to excellence” and talk up digital innovation, but let’s not kid ourselves—these are harder times and a leaner crew.
And if you’re hungry for more on how media companies are adapting, check out Connective Magazine, which tracks these shake-ups with a business-savvy lens.
The Real Trade-Offs: Cheap Today, Costly Tomorrow?
Will cuts like this help CBS and Paramount survive? Maybe. But they come with big risks—burnout, brain drain, and choppy coverage when news breaks. It’s the classic “penny wise, pound foolish” dilemma: quarterly business health versus long-term brand and trust.
More bluntly? Cut too deep, and you risk shrinking your way into irrelevance. Audiences have choices, after all, and streaming viewers are famously brand-agnostic.
Let’s not forget: Big layoffs don’t solve the core problem. Streaming has yet to offset lost ad revenue from TV, and young audiences aren’t rushing back to linear news, even as the planet cooks and Congress throws punches.
If you’re a CBS exec, the hope is that you can steady the ship before the next storm. If you’re staff, it’s LinkedIn scrolls and coffee chats—for now.
Bottom Line? Less About Glor, More About the Game
So why is Jeff Glor leaving CBS? Simple—he’s collateral damage in a vast, unavoidable financial overhaul. No bad blood, no ratings crisis, no scandal. Instead, it’s the spreadsheet in the C-suite doing the cutting.
Expect more twists as legacy media giants race to shed costs, court streaming dollars, and chase an audience that’s already halfway out the door. More headlines will follow; more trusted journalists will vanish, through no fault of their own.
And CBS News? It’s on to the next cycle, thinner and a little less familiar.
Bottom line: Jeff Glor didn’t leave CBS—CBS (and the creaky economics of old media) left him. If you’re in the news business, or just glued to the next round of layoffs, keep your phone handy. In 2024, job security is just another story—until it’s yours.
Also Read: